Dynamic Contrast Enhanced-MRI and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Quantitation for Differentiate Hepatocellular Carcinoma from Hepatocellular Adenoma.

BACKGROUND: Due to their overlapping radiological characteristics, hepatic lesions, such as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and hepatocellular adenoma (HCA), present a substantial diagnostic challenge. Accurate differentiation between HCC and HCA is essential for the best clinical treatment and therapeutic decision-making. This study aims to assess the potential role of DCE-MRI and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) quantitation in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from hepatocellular adenoma (HCA). METHODS: 103 patients (56 HCC, 47 HCA) with histopathologically proven hepatocellular lesions were the subjects of a cross-sectional investigation. A standardized imaging technique was used for DCE-MRI on all patients. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) provided the ADC values. The diagnostic efficacy of DCE-MRI and ADC in differentiation was evaluated using statistical analyses, such as t-tests and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. SPSS VER 16 was used for the analysis of the collected data. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients (female: male= 52:51, 57.14±3.09 years) were included in the study. The study revealed significant differences in DCE-MRI parameters and ADC values between HCC and HCA lesions. ADC value was significantly lower in HCC than in HCA (p < 0.001). The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.78 (95% CI: 0.69-0.87) for ADC, 0.84 (95% CI: 0.76-0.91) for Ktrans, and 0.72 (95% CI: 0.62-0.82) for Ve. Sensitivity and specificity for ADC were 76.59% and 71.42%, respectively. Also, PPV and NPV of ADC were 69.23% and 78.43%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for Ktrans were 82.14% and 76.59%, respectively. Also, PPV and NPV of Ktrans were 80.7% and 78.26%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, DCE-MRI-derived parameters, along with ADC values, exhibit promise as non-invasive tools for differentiating HCC from HCA.

Hepatocellular adenoma subtyping by qualitative MRI features and machine learning algorithm of integrated qualitative and quantitative features: a proof-of-concept study.

AIM: To evaluate hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) subtyping using qualitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features and feasibility of differentiating HCA subtypes using machine learning (ML) of qualitative and quantitative MRI features with histopathology as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 39 histopathologically subtyped HCAs (13 hepatocyte nuclear factor (HNF)-1-alpha mutated [HHCA], 11 inflammatory [IHCA], one beta-catenin-mutated [BHCA], and 14 unclassified [UHCA]) in 36 patients. HCA subtyping by two blinded radiologists using the proposed schema of qualitative MRI features and using the random forest algorithm was compared against histopathology. For quantitative features, 1,409 radiomic features were extracted after segmentation and reduced to 10 principle components. Support vector machine and logistic regression was applied to assess HCA subtyping. RESULTS: Qualitative MRI features with proposed flow chart yielded diagnostic accuracies of 87%, 82%, and 74% for HHCA, IHCA, and UHCA respectively. The ML algorithm based on qualitative MRI features showed AUCs (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [ROC] curve) of 0.846, 0.642, and 0.766 for diagnosing HHCA, IHCA, and UHCA, respectively. Quantitative radiomic features from portal venous and hepatic venous phase MRI demonstrated AUCs of 0.83 and 0.82, with a sensitivity of 72% and a specificity of 85% in predicting HHCA subtype. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed schema of integrated qualitative MRI features with ML algorithm provided high accuracy for HCA subtyping while quantitative radiomic features provide value for diagnosis of HHCA. The key qualitative MRI features for differentiating HCA subtypes were concordant between the radiologists and the ML algorithm. These approaches appear promising to better inform clinical management for patients with HCA.

Inflammatory Hepatocellular Adenoma Mimicking Focal Nodular Hyperplasia That Grew during Pregnancy and Changed Its Appearance on Magnetic Resonance Imaging after Delivery.

We reported a notable case of inflammatory hepatocellular adenoma that grew during pregnancy, consequently changing its appearance on magnetic resonance imaging remarkably. A 5-months-pregnant 35-year-old woman presented with a 37-mm liver nodule that had been diagnosed as focal nodular hyperplasia 3 years earlier. She had never used oral contraceptives. After 2 months, the nodule grew to 57 mm. The patient delivered a full-term infant without complications. Gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging performed after delivery revealed markedly different findings compared with the first images. A liver biopsy was performed, and the tumor was diagnosed as inflammatory hepatocellular adenoma.

The Early-Enhancing Hepatic Vein: Differentiating Focal Nodular Hyperplasia and Hepatic Adenoma With Pathologic Validation in MRI.

BACKGROUND: Focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and hepatic adenoma (HA) are two common benign liver lesions with different management options. In particular, resection is considered for large HA lesions to avoid possible bleeding complications or rarely malignant degeneration. PURPOSE: To determine whether early enhancement of a draining hepatic vein (EDHV) and absence of perilesional enhancement (PLE) on arterial phase MR images are useful for distinguishing FNH from HA. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. POPULATION: A total of 34 patients: 16 with FNH and 18 with HA lesions. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: A1.5 T, axial T1 fat-suppressed arterial postcontrast. ASSESMENT: Four abdominal radiologists blinded to pathologic diagnosis assessed for the presence or absence of EDHV in association with the lesion, definitively characterized by pathology. This was considered present if contrast could be identified in a hepatic vein contiguous with the lesion in question. Secondarily, PLE was evaluated. STATISTICAL TESTS: Fleiss's multirater kappa statistic, Chi-squared statistic, Phi-coefficient. Significance level P < 0.05. RESULTS: Considering all observations obtained from the four readers, an EDHV was identified with FNH 48.5% of the time. EDHV was seen with HA in 8.8% of cases. PLE was seen with significantly greater frequency in HA. The presence of an EDHV was associated with the absence of PLE. DATA CONCLUSION: In a lesion that may be either an FNH or HA, confident identification on arterial phase images of an EDHV should lead the reader to favor FNH, while the presence PLE should dissuade the reader from FNH. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 4. TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

[Benign solid liver tumors]. / Benigne solide Lebertumoren.

Benign solid liver tumors are frequently discovered during routine sonographic examinations. As a rule, malignant tumors can be excluded using contrast medium-based sectional imaging; however, unclear cases can represent a diagnostic challenge. The category of solid benign liver tumors includes first and foremost hepatocellular adenoma (HCA), focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and hemangioma. Based on the most recent data, an overview of the current standards in the diagnostics and treatment is given.

Subtyping of hepatocellular adenomas using Gd-EOB-DTPA: a qualitative and quantitative analysis.

BACKGROUND: The goal of medical imaging is not only to identify the entity "hepatocellular adenoma," but to detect typical magnetic resonance (MR) patterns of the subtypes so that lesions with a higher malignant transformation rate could be differentiated from those that should just be controlled. PURPOSE: To evaluate the differentiation between subtypes of hepatocellular adenomas using hepatobiliary specific contrast agent (Gd-EOB-DTPA) in MR imaging. MATERIAL/METHODS: A total of 11 patients with 39 lesions with histologically proven hepatocellular adenomas were evaluated. Of the, 34 were inflammatory hepatocellular adenomas (IHCA) and 5 were HNF1α adenomas. No ß-catenin-mutated adenoma was found. In all patients, a standard protocol considering the guidelines of the international consensus conference of Gd-EOB-DTPA was performed in a 1.5-T scanner. Besides a qualitative analysis of all sequences, we measured the quantitative signal intensity (SI) ratio in all examinations. RESULTS: Qualitative analysis showed that best sequences for differentiation of HNF1α adenomas from IHCA were T1-weighted (T1W) precontrast (P = 0.03) and portalvenous phase (P < 0.0001) as well as arterial phase (P = 0.002). All adenomas were hypointense in hepatobiliary phase (15 min). The quantitative analyses of the SI ratio and of lesion-to-liver contrast (LLC) ratio show statistically significant differences in T1W precontrast (SI: P = 0.035; LLC: P = 0.049) and portalvenous phase (SI: P = 0.002; LLC: P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Subtyping of hepatocellular adenomas using Gd-EOB-DTPA is possible due to qualitative and quantitative analyses regarding T1W precontrast and portalvenous phase. In addition, the SI ratio and liver-to-lesion contrast ratio in the arterial phase gave additional qualitative information for differentiation.

A nationwide assessment of hepatocellular adenoma resection: Indications and pathological discordance.

Hepatocellular adenomas (HCAs) are benign liver tumors associated with bleeding or malignant transformation. Data on the indication for surgery are scarce. We analyzed indications and outcome of patients operated for HCAs < 50 mm compared to HCAs ≥ 50 mm. Changes in final postoperative diagnosis were assessed. We performed a retrospective study that included patients who underwent resection for (suspected) HCAs in the Netherlands from 2014 to 2019. Indication for resection was analyzed and stratified for small (<50 mm) and large (≥50 mm) tumors. Logistic regression analysis was performed on factors influencing change in tumor diagnosis. Out of 222 patients who underwent surgery, 44 (20%) patients had a tumor <50 mm. Median age was 46 (interquartile range [IQR], 33-56) years in patients with small tumors and 37 (IQR, 31-46) years in patients with large tumors ( p  = 0.016). Patients with small tumors were more frequently men (21% vs. 5%, p  = 0.002). Main indications for resection in patients with small tumors were suspicion of (pre)malignancy (55%), (previous) bleeding (14%), and male sex (11%). Patients with large tumors received operations because of tumor size >50 mm (52%), suspicion of (pre)malignancy (28%), and (previous) bleeding (5.1%). No difference was observed in HCA-subtype distribution between small and large tumors. Ninety-six (43%) patients had a postoperative change in diagnosis. Independent risk factors for change in diagnosis were tumor size <50 mm (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.4; p  < 0.01), male sex (aOR, 3.7; p  = 0.03), and lack of hepatobiliary contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) (aOR, 1.8; p  = 0.04). Resection for small (suspected) HCAs was mainly indicated by suspicion of (pre)malignancy, whereas for large (suspected) HCAs, tumor size was the most prevalent indication. Male sex, tumor size <50 mm, and lack of hepatobiliary CE-MRI were independent risk factors for postoperative change in tumor diagnosis.

Steatotic hepatocellular adenoma: an unusual cause of a hypermetabolic liver lesion.

A 22-year-old woman with a history of surgically treated pelvic teratoma and solid liver lesion in the extension study. Radiological follow-up was decided. This liver lesion experienced a progressive increase in size, reaching 6 cm. Contrast-enhanced liver MRI was performed, revealing a heterogeneous mass in the right hepatic lobe with non-hepatocyte-like behaviour. With this information, the following entities were ruled out: haemangioma, adenoma, hepatocarcinoma and focal nodular hyperplasia. Given that it could be a teratoma metastasis, a tumour of any other origin or a non-tumoral lesion with no hepatocyte component, it was decided to perform a 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT scan. It showed the liver mass with notable glycolytic hypermetabolism, suggestive of malignancy. In a multidisciplinary committee, it was decided to perform a laparoscopic right hepatectomy. Pathological examination revealed a benign hepatocytic lesion compatible with a steatotic adenoma.

Hepatic Adenoma Subtypes on Hepatobiliary Phase of Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND. Accumulating evidence indicates that hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) may have a higher frequency of hepatobiliary phase (HBP) iso- or hyperintensity than previously reported. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the proportion of HCA that shows iso- or hyperintensity in the HBP of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI, stratified by HCA subtype (HNF1a-inactivated [H-HCA], inflammatory [I-HCA], ß-catenin-activated [B-HCA], and unclassified [U-HCA] HCA), and to assess the diagnostic performance of HBP iso- or hyperintensity for differentiating focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) from HCA. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched through February 14, 2022, for articles reporting HBP signal intensity on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI among pathologically proven HCAs, stratified by subtype. The pooled proportion of HBP iso- or hyperintensity was determined for each subtype and compared using metaregression. Diagnostic performance of HBP iso- or hyperintensity for differentiating FNH from all HCA subtypes combined and from B-HCA and U-HCA combined was assessed using bivariate modeling. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS. Twenty-eight studies (12 original investigations, 16 case reports or case series) were included, yielding 364 patients with 410 HCAs (112 H-HCAs, 203 I-HCAs, 33 B-HCAs, 62 U-HCAs). Pooled proportion of HBP iso- or hyperintensity was 14% (95% CI, 4-26%) among all HCAs, 0% (95% CI, 0-2%) among H-HCAs, 11% (95% CI, 0-29%) among U-HCAs, 14% (95% CI, 2-31%) among I-HCAs, and 59% (95% CI, 26-88%) among B-HCAs; metaregression showed significant difference among subtypes (p < .001). In four studies reporting diagnostic performance information, HBP iso- or hyperintensity had sensitivity of 99% (95% CI, 57-100%) and specificity of 89% (95% CI, 82-94%) for differentiating FNH from all HCA subtypes and sensitivity of 99% (95% CI, 53-100%) and specificity of 65% (95% CI, 44-80%) for differentiating FNH from B-HCA or U-HCA. CONCLUSION. HCA subtypes other than H-HCA show proportions of HBP iso- or hyperintensity ranging from 11% (U-HCA) to 59% (B-HCA). Low prevalence of B-HCA has contributed to prior reports of high diagnostic performance of HBP iso- or hyperintensity for differentiating FNH from HCA. CLINICAL IMPACT. Radiologists should recognize the low specificity of HBP iso- or hyperintensity on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for differentiating FNH from certain HCA subtypes.

Hepatocellular Adenoma Subtypes Based on 2017 Classification System: Exploratory Study of Gadoxetate Disodium-Enhanced MRI Features With Proposal of a Diagnostic Algorithm.

BACKGROUND. The classification of hepatocellular adenomas (HCAs) was updated in 2017 on the basis of genetic and molecular analysis. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article was to evaluate features on gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI of HCA subtypes on the basis of the 2017 classification and to propose a diagnostic algorithm for determining subtype using these features. METHODS. This retrospective study included 56 patients (49 women, seven men; mean age, 37 ± 13 [SD] years) with histologically confirmed HCA evaluated by gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI from January 2010 to January 2021. Subtypes were reclassified using 2017 criteria: hepatocyte nuclear factor-1α mutated HCA (HHCA), inflammatory HCA (IHCA), ß-catenin exon 3 activated HCA (ß-HCA), mixed inflammatory and ß-HCA (ß-IHCA), sonic hedgehog HCA (shHCA), and unclassified HCA (UHCA). Qualitative MRI features were assessed. Liver-to-lesion contrast enhancement ratios (LLCERs) were measured. Subtypes were compared, and a diagnostic algorithm was proposed. RESULTS. The analysis included 65 HCAs: 16 HHCAs, 31 IHCAs, six ß-HCA, four ß-IHCA, five shHCA, and three UHCAs. HHCAs showed homogeneous diffuse intralesional steatosis in 94%, whereas all other HCAs showed this finding in 0% (p < .001). IHCAs showed the "atoll" sign in 58%, whereas all other HCAs showed this finding in 12% (p < .001). IHCAs showed moderate T2 hyperintensity in 52%, whereas all other HCAs showed this finding in 12% (p < .001). The ß-HCAs and ß-IHCAs occurred in men in 63%, whereas all other HCAs occurred in men in 4% (p < .001). The ß-HCAs and ß-IHCAs had a mean size of 10.1 ± 6.8 cm, whereas all other HCAs had a mean size of 5.1 ± 2.9 cm (p = .03). The ß-HCAs and ß-IHCAs showed fluid components in 60%, whereas all other HCAs showed this finding in 5% (p < .001). Hepatobiliary phase iso- or hyperintensity was observed in 80% of ß-HCAs and ß-IHCAs versus 5% of all other HCAs (p < .001). Hepatobiliary phase LLCER was positive in nine HCAs (eight ß-HCAs and ß-IHCAs; one IHCA). The shHCA and UHCA did not show distinguishing features. The proposed diagnostic algorithm had accuracy of 98% for HHCAs, 83% for IHCAs, and 95% for ß-HCAs or ß-IHCAs. CONCLUSION. Findings on gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI, including hepatobiliary phase characteristics, were associated with HCA subtypes using the 2017 classification. CLINICAL IMPACT. The algorithm identified common HCA subtypes with high accuracy, including those with ß-catenin exon 3 mutations.

[Analysis of MRI features of hepatocyte nuclear factor 1α-inactivated hepatocellular adenoma].

Objective: To investigate the MRI imaging features of hepatocyte nuclear factor 1α- inactivated hepatocellular adenoma (H-HCA). Methods: Clinical data and MRI images of 19 H-HCA cases who were pathologically confirmed at Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University between August 2014 and July 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, there were 15 females and 4 males, aged 16-47 (32± 7) years old. Tumor number, location, shape, size, boundary, MRI plain scan signal intensity, dynamic enhancement features of each phase, presence or absence of intratumoral fat content, pseudocapsule, and others were analyzed. The differences in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values between the lesion and the surrounding normal liver parenchyma were compared for statistical significance. t-test was used for statistical analysis. Results: There were a total of 24 lesions in 19 cases. 14 cases had solitary lesions, and five cases had multiple lesions. 15 and nine lesions were located in the right and left lobes of the liver, respectively. 20 lesions were round or quasi-round, and four were irregular or lobulated. The tumor's maximal diameter was 0.6-8.6 (3.5 ± 2.4) cm. T(1)-weighted image (WI) showed hyperintense to iso-intense signals in 20 lesions and hypointense signals in four. T(2)WI showed iso-to-slightly high signal intensity in 16 lesions, with two hyperintense and six hypointense signals. Diffusion-weighted image (DWI) revealed hyperintense to iso-intense signals. Lesions mean ADC value was (1.289 ± 0.222)×10(-3) mm(2)/s, while the adjacent normal liver parenchyma's mean ADC value was (1.307 ± 0.236)×10(-3) mm(2)/s, with no statistically significant difference between the two (P > 0.05). During the arterial phase, 15 of the 18 lesions that underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced scanning with gadoxetate disodium (Gd-DTPA) were mildly to moderately enhanced and three were strongly enhanced. The portal and hepatic venous phases had no continuous enhancement, while the delayed phase showed a hypointense signal. During the arterial phase, two of the six lesions scanned by gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid ((Gd-EOB-DTPA) dynamic enhancement were mildly to moderately enhanced, while four were strongly enhanced. The portal and hepatic venous phases had no continuous enhancement, while the transition and hepatobiliary-specific phases showed hypointense signals. Intracellular steatosis occurred in 21 lesions, of which 19 were diffuse steatosis and 16 formed pseudocapsules in the delayed phase. Conclusion: H-HCA often occurs in young females as solitary lesions and has certain MRI features. T1WI anti-phase diffuse signal reduction and post-enhanced hypovascular withdrawal enhancement patterns can aid in accurately diagnosing the disease condition.

Focal Benign Liver Lesions and Their Diagnostic Pitfalls.

Focal hepatic lesions are frequently discovered incidentally on cross-sectional imaging or abdominal ultrasound, and in the general population, a vast majority of those incidental findings are benign entities. However, the formal diagnosis of benign liver lesions is not always straightforward and may require advanced imaging modalities, such as MRI with hepatobiliary contrast agent or contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). This review presents the typical features of the main benign liver lesions, including focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH), hepatocellular adenoma (HCA), hepatic cysts, hemangioma, angiomyolipoma, and pseudotumors, such as inflammatory pseudotumors or hepatic granulomas. However, beyond the specific and classical MRI features, some lesions may present atypical patterns. Moreover, arterial phase hyperenhancement, often present in benign liver lesions, can be seen in malignant lesions such as hepatocellular carcinoma. Hence, accurate analysis of clinical and biological contexts is mandatory to optimize our diagnostic performance. The objective of this investigation was, therefore, to review the specific presentations of benign liver tumors and to illustrate their diagnostic pitfalls.

Fat in mass in primary liver lesions: are usual MRI diagnostic criteria of both malignant and benign liver lesions still applicable?

PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of the usual MRI diagnostic patterns of primary liver lesions applied to the diagnosis of pathologically proven fat-containing liver lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This monocentric IRB approved retrospective study included all patients with pathologically proven focal liver lesions and documented intra-tumoral fat on pathology and who underwent preoperative liver MRI for characterization. Both liver morphology and usual lesion MRI features were analyzed and their distribution correlated to the final pathological result (Khi-2 or Fisher exact tests, Student t-test or Mann-Whitney U test, as appropriate). The Sensitivity (Se) and Specificity (Sp) of MRI patterns known to be associated to both Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC), Focal Nodular Hyperplasia (FNH), and Hepatocellular Adenoma (HCA) subtypes were evaluated. RESULTS: Between March 2014 and November 2021, 66 lesions were included, corresponding to: 26 HCC, 32 HCA, 6 FNH and 2 hepatic angiomyolipoma (HAML). All lesions developed on a dysmorphic liver were HCC. A non-rim arterial phase hyperenhancement with a washout and an enhancing capsule had a 98% specificity for HCC diagnosis; A homogeneous dropout of signal on the opposed phase had a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 89% for the diagnosis of HNF1alpha inactivated subtype of HCA (HHCA). The FNH pattern was specific at 100% for the diagnosis of FNH with a 40% Se. Finally, the accuracy of inflammatory hepatocellular adenoma (IHCA) pattern had a low 60% Se but a high 89% Sp for IHCA diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Known MRI patterns remain reliable for the accurate diagnosis of primary liver tumors on MRI even in fat-containing lesions.

Diagnostic value of color parametric imaging and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the differentiation of hepatocellular adenoma and well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To investigate the differential diagnostic value of computer-aided color parametric imaging (CPI) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) and well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma (wHCC). METHOD: A total of 38 patients who underwent CEUS and were pathologically diagnosed with HCA (10 cases) and wHCC (28 cases) were reviewed retrospectively. The differences between the radiological features of HCA and wHCC were compared by two readers, blinded to the final diagnosis. RESULTS: (a) Sonographic features: on gray-scale ultrasound, halo sign was more common in wHCC than in HCA (60.7% vs. 10.0%, p = 0.009). On CEUS, hyper- or isoenhancement was more common in HCA in the portal phase (90.0% vs. 50.0%; p = 0.022). On CPI mode, HCA was inclined toward centripetal enhancement (60.0% vs. 14.3% p = 0.010). HCA was characterized by the presence of pseudocapsule enhancement (50.0% vs. 14.3%; p = 0.036). Quantitative analysis showed that the arrival time of HCA was earlier than that of wHCC (12.4 ± 3.7 s vs. 15.9 ± 3.2 s; p = 0.006). (b) Interobserver agreement was improved by using CPI compared with CEUS. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the combination were 80.0%, 85.7%, and 84.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: CEUS combined with CPI can provide effective information for the differential diagnosis of HCA and wHCC, especially for the non-experienced radiologists.

[Hepatocellular adenoma as a cause of liver rupture and intrauterine foetal death].

During pregnancy, hepatocellular adenoma HCA may grow, which increases the risk of rupture. In this case report, a 34-year-old woman at gestational age 34+ weeks was admitted to hospital with abdominal pain, hypovolaemia and intrauterine foetal death from a ruptured hepatocellular adenoma. It was successfully managed with trans-arterial embolisation and caesarean section, followed by laparoscopic liver resection four weeks later. Spontaneous liver rupture during pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of maternal and foetal mortality, and appropriate interventional radiology and surgical measures are essential for successful treatment.

Not All Hepatocellular Adenomas are Caused by the Hormonal Oral Contraceptive.

This is a case report of a female patient with multiple hepatocellular adenomas secondary to the glycogen storage disease 1a with asymptomatic and late adult-onset presentation. Even though the patient was taking a hormonal oral contraceptive, it was important to identify the genetic disorder and ensure adequate metabolic control which is considered a modifier of the adenoma formation and progression. It is also imperative that the patient gets monitored for the adenoma-to-hepatocellular carcinoma transformation.